Debunking the Lead Paint Myth

Dec 5, 2016 | Lead

164 Massachusetts Public Schools Test High For Lead In Water

A large amount of media attention has been given to the drinking water conditions in Flint, Michigan and the high levels of lead found in the municipally-supplied water to residences in that city.  In response to the Flint, Michigan story, many cities and states have quietly begun testing their own drinking water supplies for lead levels.  Massachusetts was one such state that recently tested for lead levels – specifically, in water supplied to public schools in the state.  The Commonwealth of Massachusetts recently reported the findings of their study of 300 public schools, which showed that 164 public schools had drinking water or water used in food preparation with lead levels above permissible regulatory limits of 15 parts per billion.

Since the 1970s, considerable attention has been given to concerns over elevated blood lead levels in children, especially those under the age of six.  As a result, the federal government and states enacted regulations regarding the permissible level of lead in drinking water.  As the Commonwealth of Massachusetts’ recent findings show, though, the potential for exposure to lead particles at higher than permissible levels continues to this day, nearly four decades after significant legislation regarding lead was promulgated.

The most notable target of federal and state regulations regarding lead involved the lead paint industry.  Prior to 1978, lead was used as one ingredient in the manufacturing process of paint in the United States.  Homes built prior to 1978 likely utilized paint products that contained lead.  Over time, the paint products peel, chip, or flake, creating a risk of lead paint ingestion for children.  Given that rooms in homes are typically repainted when normal renovations or maintenance is performed, lead paint used in millions of homes built prior to 1978 remained there for decades.  As these homes age and the paint naturally wears away, the potential for children to ingest paint chips containing lead increases.

Whenever a child’s blood lead levels show elevated lead in the blood, the easiest target for plaintiffs’ attorneys are homeowners, property managers, and landlords.  This is due in large part to strict laws in many states that hold homeowners and landlords liable for elevated blood lead levels in children (whether the child shows any signs of developmental delay or not) if the child resided in the home and there was lead present in the paint in the home.  In Massachusetts alone, there were 3,700 reported cases of elevated blood lead levels in 2015.  As the Commonwealth of Massachusetts’ recent findings show, looking only to lead paint as the possible cause of elevated blood lead levels is unfair to homeowners and landlords given the number of other potential sources for exposure to lead that a child might have.

Lead particles can be found in numerous other items, including drinking water, soil and sand contaminated from leaded gasoline emissions, toys manufactured overseas, certain candies manufactured in Mexico, crayons, cathode tubes in old televisions and computer monitors, and cosmetics, just to name a few.  Lead particles can be ingested by children from all of these potential sources, which can result in elevated blood lead levels.  The myth portrayed, however, is that lead paint is the only cause of elevated blood lead levels in children.

It is important for landlords, home owners, and property managers to take appropriate steps to test for or monitor the conditions of lead paint in their homes, and steps must be taken to notify tenants of potential lead paint hazards in order to comply with state and federal law.  If you are a homeowner, landlord, or property owner, there are ways to mitigate the risk of being sued for lead paint claims and CMBG3 Law LLC can provide counsel to you on these subjects.  In addition, if you have been sued because one of your tenants’ children has elevated blood lead levels, we can help.

John Gardella has represented clients in lead poisoning claims, including defending homeowners, landlords, and property managers in Housing Court and Superior Court.  If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact John Gardella at 617-936-4353, ext. 204 or email him.



  1. Lead In Cosmetics: FDA Steps In and Issues Guidance For Recommended Maximum Levels | CMBG3 Law - […] there are many sources from which a person potentially can be exposed to lead particles (see ‚ÄúDebunking The Lead…
  2. Federal Lead Paint Mitigation Grants Given to New Hampshire and Vermont | CMBG3 Law - […] Whenever a child’s blood lead levels show elevated lead in the blood, the easiest target for plaintiffs’ attorneys are…
  3. Paint Companies Fight Back Against $1.15 Lead Ruling In California | CMBG3 Law - […] companies argued on appeal that lead paint is only one of many potential sources for lead exposure. CMBG3 Law…

Leave a Reply

Written by:


To be notified when a new article is available, please subscribe below.

Select list(s)*