Environmental

Compliance & Litigation

CMBG3’s Comprehensive

Environmental Services

Meeting Compliance

Identify legislation that will impact your business and recommend action steps to avoid disruption of business

Help clients develop comprehensive compliance programs to lower risk and reduce costs

65

Specialists in California’s Proposition 65, which regulates over 900 chemicals and requires detailed compliance steps from companies that sell, distribute, or manufacture
products in California

Suzanne Englot, former Environmental Health and Safety Consultant, provides unique
expertise to ensure regulatory compliance

Health & Safety

Develop ways to integrate regulatory compliance systems with environmental
monitoring and measuring

Help clients achieve compliance objectives with health and safety training and
implementation

Create policies and procedures that encompass employee health and safety

Help companies with workplace violations achieve quick compliance

Environmental Litigation

Examples of environmental litigation cases that we have handled include:

Z

Post-fire contamination cases

Z

Hazardous waste site cleanup cases

Z

Transportation of hazardous waste cases

Z

Underground oil tank and boiler release cases

Z

Land, property, and water contamination, including CERCLA claims

Z

PFAS contamination

Z

Prop 65 litigation cases

Strength

in Numbers

Third-Party Lab Testing and the New Wave of Consumer Product Litigation: What Manufacturers Need to Know

A common thread connects a growing number of consumer product class actions filed over the past two years: in nearly every case, the lawsuit traces...

Hardwick PFAS Case and Potential Class of 11 Million People Is Back

We previously wrote several articles on the Hardwick v. 3M case that originated in Ohio state court and found its way to the Sixth Circuit Court of...

Court Rebuffs EPA Efforts To Stay PFAS Drinking Water Legal Challenge

We have previously detailed the EPA’s efforts under the Biden Administration to regulate certain types of PFAS under the Safe Drinking Water Act...

PFAS Warning Labels On Consumer Goods – New Mexico Leads the Way

During 2025, the New Mexico Legislature passed the PFAS Protection Act (HB 212) that aimed to create a phase out of PFAS-containing products within...

PFAS Consumer Fraud Case Ruling Involving Smartwatches Allows Potentially Massive Class Action To Proceed

About a year ago, we wrote regarding a PFAS consumer fraud lawsuit brought against Apple alleging that its smartwatches contained PFAS, which...

Tiny Particles, Big Risk: Could Netflix’s New Documentary, The Plastic Detox, Accelerate Microplastic Litigation in the Cosmetic and Personal Care Product Industry?

The concept of “microplastics” became popular in 2004 after a marine biologist revealed widespread plastic particles in marine environments,...

PFAS Drinking Water Legal Battle Briefing Continues

We have previously detailed the EPA’s efforts under the Biden Administration to regulate certain types of PFAS under the Safe Drinking Water Act. In...

PFAS Air Emissions Back On EPA’s Radar

We have published in recent years several times on PFAS air emissions issues, including legislative efforts to compel standards for PFAS in air...

“Sound Science” Legislation and Environmental Regulations Clash In Several States

Under the second Trump administration, the Make American Healthy Again program has as one of its central pillars the "sound science" principle,...

John Gardella To Speak At Cosmetics Industry Conference On Class Action Trends

John Gardella was invited to speak at American Conference Institute's Cosmetics & Personal Care Products Conference on March 12 and 13, 2026 in...

Regulated chemicals for which we counsel clients

Team members specializing in environmental issues

States in which we represent clients for environmental issues

Experts in California’s Prop 65 regulations

Overturning Massachusetts DEP’s Decision to Levy Fines

Our client was a light industrial company that, due to the nature of its work, stored several types of liquid and chemical waste on its property for later disposal. A fire damaged a large portion of the company building where the chemicals were stored. It was determined to be an accidental fire; however, the fire caused several containers of chemicals to explode, leading to contamination of the company’s land. The Massachusetts DEP investigated the chemical runoff from the fire and alleged that the chemicals had permeated public land and waterways at levels above allowable concentrations. Our investigation of surrounding industrial sources of pollution, our site inspections, and soil and water samples performed by an expert LSP enabled us to write a comprehensive response report to the DEP showing that the chemical pollution was confined to the company’s property and had likely never contaminated public soil or waterways. With our report and negotiations with the DEP, the agency dismissed the Notice of Responsibility against our client, thereby saving our client thousands of dollars in fines.

California Team

New England Team

John P. Gardella

Shareholder

Bryna Rosen Misiura

Shareholder

How We Can Help You

While all of our attorneys litigate environmental cases, should you need help with an issue in a specific state in which we regularly handle environmental legal matters, please contact

Speak to Your Environmental Law Advocate